The Nyayo Intervarsity Mediation Competition concluded successfully at Kabarak University Law School, bringing to a close several days of rigorous competition, intellectual engagement, and the celebration of excellence in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).

The pursuit of justice is not always won in a courtroom. Sometimes, it begins with a conversation. This week, Kabarak Law School became the meeting point for some of Kenya's finest young legal minds as it hosted the Nyayo Intervarsity Mediation Competition, a platform that challenges students to resolve disputes through dialogue, negotiation, and sound legal reasoning.

The Legal Aid Act, No 6 of 2016^[1], was a watershed moment in Kenya’s access-to-justice architecture. Enacted to give effect to Articles 19(2), 48 and 50(2)(g) and (h) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010,^[2] it established the National Legal Aid Service (NLAS)^[3] and, crucially, created the Legal Aid Fund as the financial engine of the entire scheme.^[4]

This blog looks critically at the independence of the National Legal Aid Service (NLAS) in Kenya ten years after the Legal Aid Act 2016 was enacted. Dominant literature on the NLAS has addressed access to justice and funding issues, but there has been insufficient consideration given to whether the institution is independent in practice. This blog, for this reason, aims at filling the void in exploring how far NLAS is independent from external influence.

This blog critically reappraises Kenya’s Legal Aid Act, 2016 (hereinafter the Act), a decade after its enactment, examining whether it has fulfilled its constitutional promise to guarantee access to justice and the right to a fair trial, including legal representation.

Legal Representation is fundamental to protecting individual rights and ensuring a fair hearing as per Article 50 of the Constitution. Nevertheless, vulnerable groups, particularly persons with disabilities (PWDs), remain disproportionately excluded from representation. This is attributed to systematic ableism, lack of resources and inaccessibility of the justice system despite the enactment of the Legal Aid Act.